In Folajtar v. Attorney General of the United States, ___
F.3d ___, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 37006 (3rd Cir. 2020), here, decided yesterday, the
Court held that a tax felon (tax perjury, § 7206(1)) was subject to the
prohibition in 18 USC § 922(g)(1) denying felons the right to possess firearms. Basically, Folajtar argued that, because her nonviolent
crime did not implicate valid reasons to deny her Second Amendment right to
bear arms, she should be exempted from the prohibition.
Most readers of this blog will understand the nature of the
claims made and resolved by the Court in the case. The case raises the constitutional issue, but
also the political issue of the Second Amendment. There was a strong dissent, wrapping the political argument into the legal argument. Already, one of the pundits who straddles the
legal / political divide is suggesting that this opinion is a good opportunity for
the conservative majority on the Court (enhanced by Amy Coney Barrett) to bolster
gun rights. Jonathan Turley, Barrett
Reloaded? A New Third Circuit Decision Could Prove The Perfect Base For A
Second Amendment Blowout (Res Ipsa Loquitur 11/25/20), here.
practitioners must make sure that to advise clients being prosecuted or at the
risk of prosecution for tax crimes that their gun “rights” will be proscribed